Apply by sending an email to [email protected]
We automate the review of pre-construction project files with AI. Teams upload their drawings and written documents, our AI checks them across four complementary dimensions, being regulations, client standards, construction best practices, and coordination consistency, and receive a structured report in 48 hours instead of several weeks.
The problem: AI alone doesn't grasp the subtleties of the field. It doesn't know that an accessibility corridor at 1.18m instead of 1.20m blocks a permit. It doesn't distinguish between an obligation and a recommendation. It doesn't catch that a dimension on an architectural drawing contradicts a structural calculation note, or that an MEP engineer has forgotten a penetration shown on the architect's plan.
If you're tired of watching the same errors and inconsistencies between stakeholders cause site delays, and you want your expertise to prevent these problems rather than simply record them, let's talk.
We're looking for a domain expert able to carry out these four types of checks rigorously, translate their expertise into rules the AI can verify, and continuously challenge our platform built by our in-house teams so that it reflects field reality as closely as possible.
<aside>
:freeda-icon-square: Website
</aside>
<aside>
:logo-linkedin: Linkedin
</aside>
Apply by sending an email to [email protected]
<aside>
:freeda-icon-square: Mission
</aside>
Your main mission will be to analyse, annotate, and produce a client-ready deliverable based on reviews of a wide variety of construction project files: residential, public-access and datacenter buildings. These reviews will span across four complementary categories that form the core of the role: